GAZETTE OPINION
Gazette opinion: Montana’s Crazy land controversy
 
        LARRY MAYER/Gazette Staff
The
 Crazy Mountains soar out of the prairie, suggesting peace and 
tranquility in this oasis of forest and streams. The idyllic landscape 
belies longstanding friction over public access to National Forest 
interspersed with private land.
The
 latest round centers on the removal of District Ranger Alex Sienkiewicz
 from field work in the Crazies to an office job pending an internal 
investigation. That action came in response to pressure from U.S. Sen. 
Steve Daines and Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue. The senator and 
secretary reacted to complaints about Sienkiewicz from ranchers and 
outfitters.
Montana 
hunters and public access advocates have stepped up to defend 
Sienkiewicz, saying he was following long-established Forest Service 
policy.
The
 simmering controversy heated up last fall when Bozeman hunter Rob 
Gregoire was cited by a Sweet Grass County deputy sheriff for 
trespassing on a trail that he and Sienkiewicz believe to be open to the
 public by “prescriptive easement,” because it has historically been 
used by the public to access otherwise inaccessible public land.
Landowners
 Lee and Barbara Langhus disagree and made the trespass complaint. There
 is no written easement allowing public access across their land, 
although the trail has long been marked on Forest Service maps and cited
 in the Gallatin Forest Travel Plan.
The
 Crazy Mountains contain more than 8,000 acres of National Forest that 
the public has no way of accessing. That forest land is surrounded by 
private holdings. The Crazies also contain a hunting district, much of 
which is inaccessible to the public, with 2,000 elk — twice the 
district’s maximum target as determined by Montana Fish Wildlife and 
Parks.
That’s the 
hunting district that Gregoire was trying to reach. The oversupply of 
elk feast on some neighbors’ hay supplies, while others profit from 
exclusive, limited hunts.
Land
 ownership in the Crazies is a checkerboard pattern of public and 
private sections that dates to the 1860s when the U.S. government gave 
Northern Pacific Railroad 17 million acres of the Montana Territory up 
to 80 miles from the rail line. More frequent confrontations are 
cropping up on land that has recently changed ownership with new owners 
who want their private property off-limits to the public. In other 
cases, long-time owners may have a beef with Forest Service personnel or
 bad experiences with the public.
Solutions won’t be easy, 
but resolution efforts need to start now. There’s only one remaining 
public access to the entire 35-mile-long eastern flank of the Crazies.
From
 facts reported previously in The Gazette, it appears that Sienkiewicz 
is being penalized for doing his job. Government employees deserve to 
know that their supervisors — even the secretary of the department 
— will stand up for them when they are serving the public.
However,
 the Forest Service and local landowners have some fence mending to do. 
Custer Gallatin Forest Supervisor Mary Erickson should have authority to
 devise better ways to build trust between local landowners and Forest 
Service personnel in the field. The local forest working group should 
actively engage citizens with differing perspectives.
In
 the long run, landowners, hunters, hikers and other public land users 
need clarification on access issues. Possible remedies include:
- Montana legislative action to provide public access while protecting private property rights.
- Litigation that would result in a Montana Supreme Court ruling.
- Land swaps to consolidate key public and private holdings.
It’s
 not realistic to believe that everyone interested in the Crazies will 
just sit down and start getting along. But we urge the Forest Service to
 start a conversation with landowners and the general public.
Daines
 and Perdue must stop micromanaging staff in the Gallatin Forest. Daines
 should listen to all his constituents, relay their concerns and then 
let land management professionals do their jobs.
Perdue
 should see that decision making about forest land is led by department 
professionals in Montana — not from his Washington, D.C., office.
 
